Publications
What Are Heads of Terms When Selling an EU Business?
Gabriel Hansen, Associate, MDN Group

Selling a business in the European Union involves navigating various legal, financial, and strategic considerations. Whether you have nurtured your company from its inception or acquired it as part of a broader investment portfolio, the sale process demands careful planning and a thorough understanding of key documents.
One such document, commonly referred to as Heads of Terms, can be instrumental in outlining major points of agreement during the initial phase of negotiations. Below, we explore the purpose of Heads of Terms, discuss their typical components, and highlight how they can foster a smooth, transparent sale process for EU-based transactions.
The Role of Preliminary Agreements in Business Transactions
Selling a business often unfolds in distinct stages, ranging from setting a market valuation to ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.
Before the more detailed aspects are finalized, it is standard practice for the buyer and seller to draft a preliminary agreement that establishes the essential components of the proposed transaction. In many cases, these foundational details are documented in Heads of Terms.
Although they are generally not legally binding regarding the ultimate conclusion of the sale, Heads of Terms guide subsequent discussions by summarizing key points of consensus.
By offering a shared framework, they help both parties maintain clarity and purpose as negotiations progress. “We often see sellers uncertain about the interplay between national regulations and the broader EU framework,” says Peter Hubert, Partner at MDN Group. “A concise preliminary agreement can reduce confusion and keep discussions productive.”
Key Elements Typically Included
The specific contents of Heads of Terms can vary, but they usually outline several critical factors.
These include identifying the buyer and seller, an initial or indicative purchase price, and any valuations that might be adjusted after further examination. The agreement typically lays out the payment structure – whether it involves deposits, staged payments, or deferred considerations – and addresses important conditional clauses like pending regulatory approvals or financing prerequisites.
Many Heads of Terms also feature confidentiality provisions to safeguard sensitive business information during talks. Additionally, the document often sets forth an estimated completion timeline and may detail exclusivity for the buyer, preventing the seller from negotiating with other potential purchasers for a given period.
Advantages of Using Heads of Terms
One main advantage of Heads of Terms is the clarity they bring. By defining initial terms and expectations, the buyer and seller share a more precise roadmap for deeper negotiations and due diligence. This openness reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings about issues such as pricing or deal structure.
A second benefit is efficiency. If a significant obstacle arises – such as a regulatory impasse or a financing challenge – it tends to surface early, minimising the risk of wasted effort later. Heads of Terms also represent a tangible show of intent. Although they do not usually mandate completion of the deal, they indicate that both parties are sincerely committed to exploring the transaction.
“Heads of Terms can significantly reduce misunderstandings by clarifying key transaction points early on,” observes David Wong, Partner at MDN Group. “When both sides know the parameters, they can allocate resources and time much more effectively.”
Potential Pitfalls to Keep in Mind
Despite their advantages, Heads of Terms carry certain risks. Misinterpretation is a notable concern. While the agreement often clarifies that it is non-binding regarding the deal itself, clauses dealing with exclusivity or confidentiality can be binding, potentially creating legal complications if breached.
Another danger is the false sense of security that may arise from having a proposed price and structure. Due diligence could reveal financial or operational concerns that necessitate amending these figures or, in some cases, abandoning the sale altogether. Finally, it is crucial to consider that EU-wide regulatory differences can complicate cross-border deals if not tackled early.
The Value of Legal Advice
Seeking legal counsel remains essential, even though Heads of Terms usually do not constitute a binding contract across all terms. An experienced lawyer can ensure that the document is drafted to protect your interests and to highlight obligations where they do exist, such as confidentiality or exclusivity. For sellers and buyers involved in cross-border transactions, specialized counsel can address diverse rules regarding competition, data protection, or industry-specific regulations.
Moreover, legal professionals can help incorporate provisions that match your strategic needs. This might include non-compete arrangements, protections for intellectual property, or clauses dealing with warranties.
Transitioning from Preliminary to Definitive Agreements
Once both parties have reviewed and agreed on the central points in Heads of Terms, attention typically shifts to drafting definitive sale contracts. These more formal agreements reflect any adjustments prompted by due diligence and set out legally enforceable obligations.
Each clause can carry significant ramifications, from representations about the business’s financial health to stipulations regarding liabilities or intellectual property rights. Thorough groundwork at the Heads of Terms stage generally leads to smoother final negotiations.
A Structured, Transparent Process
Conducting a business sale in the EU requires solid planning, robust legal advice, and clear communication at each juncture. This preliminary framework offers clarity, efficiency, and a measure of mutual trust that often proves vital to securing a successful deal.
When combined with expert guidance – particularly for cross-border transactions – Heads of Terms serve as a strong catalyst for an orderly and rewarding sale process that meets the expectations of both parties.